Tails magazine presents...

Supreme Court upholds animal cruelty media

In Animal News on April 21, 2010 at 6:34 pm

The U.S. Supreme Court decided on Monday, April 19 to invalidate a federal law prohibiting the sale of videos, photographs, or other media depicting acts of animal cruelty.

The now-defunct law, the Depiction of Animal Cruelty Act, was created to prevent the commercial sale of such “entertainment” videos from stimulating a market for depictions of animal abuse and thereby encouraging acts of animal cruelty.

While the Supreme Court found that depictions of animals were protected forms of free speech under the First Amendment, the American Human Association disagrees. American Humane’s interim president and CEO, George C. Casey stated: “Deliberately killing animals for entertainment has nothing to do with freedom of speech.  Americans are within their right to keep blatant animal torture and killing out of the marketplace, and the Supreme Court should have made that the priority over the supposed protections of those who take sick pleasure in this material.”

The American Humane Association has urged the Supreme Court to reconsider the ruling, arguing that it will only be used to shield criminals from punishment for their crimes against animals. You can learn more about the Supreme Court ruling and the human cost of animal abuse at American Humane’s website at AmericanHumane.org. –Amanda Hughes

About these ads
  1. Is this as ridiculous to anyone else as it is to me? It seems as though these videos, pictures, etc. are inflammatory and promote violent and illegal behaviors by glamorizing dog fighting. I’m fairly sure that is not covered under free speech. We are also constantly given excuses for why dog fighting is okay, like it is “part of the culture.” How is that an excuse? I am going to stop now before I go off on an expletive laced rant…

  2. I totally agree with the above comment. The Supreme Court should be rallied to re-visit their descision. Freedom of speech is one thing, promoting cruelity to animals is another. What were they thinking???? bbg

  3. the judge surely is not an animal lover. so damn ridiculous. What is wrong with this country?

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

%d bloggers like this: